When I heard the Learnd Astronomer :: essays research papers

Upon rare occasion, my freshman sidekick actually decided to pull his nose out of his lousy tv game, and join me upon reading this poem. Actually, I should say that I forced him to do this, because he needed to analyze a poem for his own slope class, and the music coming from the television was beyond annoying. Anyway, my brothers reply to the poem was something along the lines of So this guy is basically saying that science, by measuring and investigating nature, somehow detracts from its beauty.Although my initial incentive was to sleep with him on the head, I restrained myself and calmly told him that he is an idiot. Where does Walt necessarily dissent with science? He doesnt. It is an assumption on my idiot brothers part that he is drawing a thick line among mechanical theory and natural beauty. The vote counter only expresses his disgust for the " professor" subject, as well as the lecture-room crowd, who is, perhaps, pretentious in his own right. He only dislik es the method with which Astronomy is presented. The poems stark contrast between the 2 attitudes just serves to present Walts opinion, which is that the subject CAN be more organic, and little robotic. By having the narrator veer towards one extreme over another, Walt ingeniously shows the possibility of middle ground.I know that I just stated the Whitman and the narrative are the same but the fact that the author and the narrator dont always have the same point of view doesnt necessarily necessitate that in this case, they have different points of view. Whitman was a follower of the Romantic impost by and large, his poems do reflect what he feels and believes. If he had wanted to, Im trustworthy he could have distanced himself from his narrators point of view more explicitly since he didnt, I assume that it wasnt his intention to do so.Returning to the poem, note the terrific quality of the verse itself. There is a common misconception that free verse implies a total disreg ard of form this is, of course, far from the truth. Read aloud, I give notice the way in which Whitman has echoed his reaction to the lecture in the long, somewhat sound lines that make no attempt to mirror the natural rhythms of speech, and the instant sculptural relief of strain when he leaves, allowing poetry to reassert itself.