'Portfolio Assignment Essay\r'

'1. â€Å"The assets of the three richest quite a little in the world match the combined yearly GDP’s of the 48 bruskest countries.” My ad hominem confidence on this program line is most well-nigh set forth by: a. Good for them †they worked unuttered to determine their wealth\r\nb. The only problem I necessitate with this is that this silver is in their bank account and non in mine c. No problem with this †m both of these people give huge amounts to charities d. I calculate that it is morally wrong for any 1 to get hold of that oftentimes(prenominal) currency e. I think that active steps should be interpreted to correct such(prenominal) immoral wealth imbalances alternative straight: A: Good for them †they worked laboured to get their wealth prize in subsidization 1: B: The only problem I deplete with this is that this money is in their bank account and non mine. Notes:\r\nI assortmentd my option because I was not wholesome con versant with the word ‘sustainability’. I have knowing that Sustainability is well-nigh what we must want to achieve. These people achieved by working hard. We must not be greed. They worked hard to achieve their desires. We all have to work hard if we need to be successful in life. I know that some allow say that thither should be fair distri hardlyion of wealth and storage allocation of resources among diverse members of the community (distributive justice). In reality, you dischargenot sit and do nothing, at the end of the month you expect to be paid the like all others who worked so hard.\r\nWhat we have to do as a nation, we have to clear a conducive environment for everyone by creating jobs, health c are centers, ensure that all children are educate for the benefit of their proximo, by this we would be creating a divulge future. Inequality could not be detrimental to the interests of the poorest of the poor (Permissible inequality) ‘John Raws†™. John Raws indicated that the poor do not get opportunity to go to proper schools or even better education so that their future can at least be bright, if we ensure that on that point is proper education, it would be a safe(p) foundation for the kids and these would reduce poverty and no one will complain about the salary or wealth of others.\r\n2. â€Å"Unless fossil-fuel use slows dramatically, the earth’s amount temperature could rise by six degrees Celsius in the beside 100 years.” My personal opinion on this statement is most tight described by: a. Who cares?\r\nb. I don’t believe this humor change nonsense\r\nc. Six degrees will make winters much more(prenominal) bearable to me personally d. I’m a present moment concerned about this, but there is nothing that I can do about it e. I’m a bit concerned about this, but why should I invest my personal time, effort or money in solving a world-wide kindly problem. f. I think that indi vidually we can and should filtrate to solve this problem for the greater good survival of the fittest now:\r\nChoice in assignment 1: F: I think that individually we can and should strive to solve this problem for the greater good. Notes:\r\nI’m still picking option ‘F’ because I have learned that when the temperature rises, there is a higher chance of di oceanses being transmitted done insects. One disease that was spread throughout the fall in States and Canada because of heat sum up was the West Nile virus. Other animals such as rats might change their habitats in acerb weather and can cause the spread of diseases. This is how the disease Hantavirus is transmitted. Heat waves can cause droughts. As a result, water levels decrease, lowering water quality and change magnitude the opportunity for disease transmission. Heat waves also subjoin health problems in humans. Average surface temperature will increase. Sea level will rise from break up ice aroun d the world. This could be as much as a meter, or much more if melting accelerates or destabilizes major ice sheets (there is out of the blue(predicate) and recent evidence of Greenland and West Ant natural rubbera becoming destabilized.) thaw or destabilization of either could raise sea level world-wide by 25 feet. Deaths will increase as a result of heat waves, drought, and flooding.\r\nWe have to begin to strive to solve this problem now as it takes time to lower concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, individual and collective action †communities, states, nations, businesses and government are needed. We have to learn about our â€Å"carbon” stair and how to reduce it by wasting less vigour and pushing for responses that would reduce carbon emissions per unit of talent apply. The less fossil fuel’s used the better.\r\nSources: Heat Waves and Unusually Warm Weather. 8/10/05. Union of Concerned Science. 12/23/05. http://www.ucsusa.org/global _warming/ intuition/early-warning-signs-of-global-warming-heat-waves.html Consequences of Global Warming. 1/3/06. Natural\r\n defence reaction Resource Council. 12/23/05. http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/fcons.asp\r\n3. â€Å"If the present harvesting trends in world population, industrialization, pollution, food production, and resource depletion track unchanged, the limits to growth on this planet will be reached sometime within the next one c years. The most probable result will be a rather sudden and uncontrollable compensate in both population and industrial capacity.” My personal opinion on this statement is most closely described by: a. I don’t believe this tale of doom.\r\nb. Yes we are down internal resources too fast, but I don’t think this is a problem as there is plenty of time to find technological solutions to problems that break through c. Yes we are consuming indispensable resources too fast. The frontmost priority in solving this is to stray the brake on human population growth. d. Yes we are consuming natural resources too fast. The first priority in solving this is for rich people to reduce their manipulation significantly. e. Yes we are consuming natural resources too fast. And honestly I don’t larn any solution because increasing consumption is the basis of our stinting growth. Choice now:\r\nChoice in assignment 1: B: ‘Yes we are consuming natural resources too fast, but I do not think this is a problem as there is plenty of time to find technological solution to problems that emerge. Notes:\r\nI still chose option ‘B’ because I think as a human accelerate we are up to the challenge. We have capable scientists who will come up with a solution to this problem. I think that a better world is possible, and that the sufferance of physical limits is the first step toward getting there.\r\n4. â€Å"If arctic ice melting continues, we are likely to see the loss of two thirds of the world’s frigid bear population within 50 years.” My personal opinion on this statement is most closely described by: a. Who cares?\r\nb. If it boils down choosing between effort a luxury SUV and worrying about diametral bears I’ll take the car any day. c. go this is sad, diametrical bears aren’t really very distinguished to my personal welfare which is my primary concern. d. small-arm this is sad, north-polar bears aren’t really very valuable to general human social welfare. e. I don’t think polar bears are all that of the essence(p) to human welfare. However, their plight is a symptom of climate change which is a big problem to future human welfare. f. I think this it is morally unacceptable for humans to put their interests ahead of the rights of other species like polar bears. Choice now: C: While this is sad, polar bears aren’t really very important to my personal welfare which is my primary concern’.\r\nChoice in assignment 1: F: I think this is morally unacceptable for humans to put their interests ahead of the rights of other species like polar bears. Notes:\r\nI don’t have to worry about Polar bears because they live In the Arctic in areas where they can hunt seals at openings in the sea ice called leads. There are five nations with polar bears: U.S. (Alaska), Canada, Russia, Greenland, and Norway. So, I really don’t think it is necessary for me\r\n'