Political Dispute in the Early 19th Century

During the 1800s, Americans in the wedlock and South often had conflict but could no longer resolve their g overnmental disputes by dint of compromise by the year 1860. In this time period, compromise was not an option because slavery and states rights caused governmental disputes between the marriage and southbound. The two political parties in the north and south lost their ability to cooperate and by the mid 1800s emergenced the go forth of the division of the states.The conjugation and South in the nineteenth century were distinguishable in lifestyle and morale as well as economy. The north had a booming industrial economy while in the South, cotton fiber was the major economic leader. Because of this congress was continuously addressing controversial matters and providing answers that did not get together either one side or both. The early 1800s were full of the North and the South making many attempts at reconciliation that just drip short. Among those were the Mi ssouri Compromise of 1820 and the Great Compromise of 1850.Other attempts led to the Tariff/ nullification Controversy, anti slavery debates in congress, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Whether it was one side or the early(a) there was always someone to oppose or defy the different side. Laws put in place eventually led to the succession of the Confederate states and the Civil War.The issue of slavery became an even greater concern when the lah Purchase territories were to infix the Union as states. The question was, would new territories enter the Union as slave or drop out states? The South valued a balance of power. They knew that if the North were to fetch more free states, past slavery in the south could be facing extinction through congress.In an attempt to conciliate with the South, the North agreed upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. through with(predicate) this slavery was banned above the 36 degrees 30 minute credit line and Missouri entered as a slave state and Maine a free state. For a while, it retained the balance of power. However, tempers in the south rose once more later in the 1820s over high tariffs. The tariffs benefited the north but threaten southerly cotton exports. In 1828 the tariff was around 50%. chair Jackson modified it to around 33% in 1832 only to have South Carolina nullify it in the state. It raised the questionof whether or not the federal government could legally impose protective tariffs and whether it was constitutional for a state to nullify a federal lawThe political view on slavery and states rights grew as compromise between the north and south political parties began to collapse during the mid 19th century. Henry Clay tell that it is unrealizable for South Carolina to become an independent state. A report of the American Anti-Slavery gild was opposed to slavery naming slave owners as man stealers and believed that slaves should be free. Political compromise was not greatly effected by their principle bu t the Compromise of 1850 resulted in the Fugitive Slave Law cosmos passed which caused the collapse in the political parties.The issue of slavery continued to increase as compromise slowly disintegrated. Abolitionism increased by the encouragement of Frederick Douglass, a leader, who promoted freedom for all slaves. Also, Uncle Toms Cabin published by Harriet Beecher started up abolitionism in the North while the South to oppose against abolitionists. Senator Daniel Webster who is opposed to secession stated that the North is not complied with the Fugitive Slave Law. In addition, a tonic York Tribune comparing working class men in the north to southern gentlemen caused more conflict between the states over the issue of slavery. The division of the states over the issue of slavery enhanced the collapse of compromise between the North and South political parties.